This story does not get both sides of the story. They get a young voters opinion and that is it.They do bring up how some judges have banned ballot selfies, if they don't go deeper and get the why they banned them.
This story is not fair becaus it doesn't have both opinions and reasoning. It tells you some facts but it doesn't get deeper.
Since the story is unfair they should not have posted it to their website. They should have waited a little longer until they could get the judges opinions from the states that have banned ballot selfies.
Obviously this story was not fully de eloped and needed maybe two to three more days to get all the opinions and facts straight from everybody.
This story also only had one source. One source does not give enough information you need many sources from each side. So they also did not follow the yardstick of context. This is again where the two to three more days would have come in handy in this story.
http://www.wdrb.com/story/33455485/posting-ballot-selfies-personal-choice-or-illegal-act
No comments:
Post a Comment